All 4 books by Edward Tufte now in
paperback editions, $100 for all 4
Visual Display of Quantitative Information
Beautiful EvidencePaper/printing = original clothbound books.
Only available through ET's Graphics Press:
catalog + shopping cart
All 4 clothbound books, autographed by the author $180
catalog + shopping cart
Edward Tufte e-books
Immediate download to any computer:
Visual and Statistical Thinking $5
The Cognitive Style of Powerpoint $5
Seeing Around + Feynman Diagrams $5
Data Analysis for Politics and Policy $9catalog + shopping cart
Edward Tufte one-day course,
Presenting Data and Information
Cambridge MA, June 3, 4
Princeton NJ, August 1
Brooklyn NY, August 2, 5
Philadelphia PA, August 6
What prompted people to display and compose maps from the "above" perspective? Although "common-sensical" to us now, at the beginning of cartography (some 5,000 years ago on clay tablets?) the "from the sky" perspective seems to be a somewhat unique notion. I'm not proposing a "chariots of the sky" (visits in ancient times by extra-terrestrials) theory but rather the thought that it was a revolutionary and radical departure from a ground view.
Any thoughts or ideas?
-- MICHAEL RYAN (email)
Neat question! It does seem pretty revolutionary, that humans would choose to depict the world from a perspective they would, for most of their history, never see firsthand. I don't know enough about the history (much less the prehistory) of maps to do more than speculate, but I would guess that the invention of plan view was the ineitable result of depiction in miniature. For instance- In order to describe where you left the buffalo carcass, you'd hunker down next to your fellow hunter and scratch a curved line in the dirt depicting the bend in the river, and maybe place a rock where the bluff is. You didn't set out to draw a landform as appears from the air, but once you reduced it to miniature, there it was, "under" you.
Make sense? Or is this explanation just my own "carto-centric" worldview imposing itself? Perhaps preliterate people used other visual displays to depict space, perhaps like the brass disks on fire-spotting towers that show the azimuth of each feature of interest?
-- Matt Frost (email)
How could it be any other way?
Dimensionality reduction is often observed in Nature. People see the equivalent of plan-views all the time: from the top of the mountain, shadows projected on the ground, even contour lines (tidelines on the beach) on a sloping flatland, the shape of the sun in the sky, a cut through a treetrunk, a curled leaf flattened under a rock, the horizon at sunset looking at a range of mountains. In Nature, there are probably many flatland projections of spaceland realities.
In the French cave drawings 15,000 to 25,000 years ago or so, animals (spaceland objects) were depicted on the wall's 2-surface. Plan-view and elevation-view are analytically equivalent for our purposes here. By the way, Arnheim once suggested that the 2-D animal-outlines drawn on cave-walls developed from the glowing edge you see outlining an animal (a dog for example) through its fur when the animal is between you and a low sun in the background. (Recent reports claim that domesticated dogs were around 150,000 years ago, long before the French cave paintings at least.) Or possibly a pointed drawing instrument might encourage outline drawings since it difficult to construct a continuous surface texture with a pointed stick or sharp rock. A paintbrush would do better.
In Visual Explantions, chapter 1, I argue the great big intellectual step with regard to maps was changing the names of the coordinate system from north-south and east-west to X and Y, that is, to any sort of empirically measured quantities for plotted observations. It was that abstraction of the map, only 500 years ago or so, that made statistical graphics possible.
Perhaps there are planview genes just as there are language genes.
Quite a number of people have a hard time reading an architectural plan-view and especially an elevation cut (as architects discover when presenting a project to a client). Experience is a fairly rapid teacher, however.
-- Edward Tufte