To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Thank you Kindly Contributor Pierre Scalise.
These network diagrams provoke the question: What is the space that network diagrams reside in? I suppose the nodes are positioned relative to one another which means there must be many diagrammatic arrangements consistent with a data set, and that the inferences about social networks perhaps depend on the arrangment chosen.
Are social network diagrams somewhat like constellation (star-myth) maps? That is, self-referential and somewhat indeterminate.
More generally, in thinking about diagrams that show links, it is helpful early on to identify the space in which the linked nouns are placed.
See also the thread on analytical issues in causal diagrams: https://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000yO&topic_id=1&topic=
While a creative director at Xplane, I recall a project with famous British historian, James Burke. He called with a request to visualize his theories about “connections” through history. It’s hard to miss his books, since he has more than 5 on the same topic: that history and major inventions and discoveries were the result of seemingly random social meetings or links between major AND minor people.
This was the most difficult information design problem I’ve ever faced. His own hand drawn maps were mind blowing. How one could link social networks across centuries of time – BUT, the amazing part of Mr. Burke’s ideas is that even if 100+ years separate people, the connection can still be made.
In many ways, his TV shows that go by the name Connections are the most appropriate format for his time jumping framework. The magic of editing in video can provide a scenario where you are standing in a Civil War battlefield in one moment, and then a quick cut and he’s in the Battle of Hastings the next – making a point about weapons all the while. – this is a format that print has a hard time trumping.
I miss James Burke, and my 3 hours with him in a Detroit conference room are my most treasured.
Lin Wilson
This form of social network is well documented in visual and textual form by Pete Frame – British Rock Historian. He neatly describes in words and diagrams the varied and complex relationships between British Rock bands in his book “The Complete Rock Family Trees” (try Amazon). His book is well worth reading for the representation of the social networks as much as interest in the history of British Rock.
Hi Folks-
I’m interested in animated data displays. It would be interesting to hear Ask ET readers’ thoughts about the following data displays of social networks recently published with a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine:
Christakis NA and Fowler JH. The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2249-58.
The animated figure is available here:
animated social network figure
A static figure published in the NY Times is below.
What are these figures biggest strengths? How could they be improved?
Thanks
Aurora