| [ Current Topics | Complete List of All Active Topics | RSS feed | Search ] |
Edward Tufte Presidential AppointmentTHE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary WASHINGTON President Obama announced his intent to appoint several individuals to serve on the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel. Their bios are below. President Obama said, "These impressive individuals will be valued additions to our team as we work to confront the challenges facing our nation. I look forward to working with them in the months and years to come."
Steven Koch, Appointee for Member, Recovery Independent Advisory Panel
Chris Sale, Appointee for Member, Recovery Independent Advisory Panel
Malcolm K. Sparrow, Appointee for Member, Recovery Independent Advisory Panel
Edward Tufte, Appointee for Member, Recovery Independent Advisory Panel
______________________________________________________________________________ From ET: I will be serving on the Recovery Independent Advisory Panel. This Panel advises The Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board, whose job is to track and explain $787 billion in recovery stimulus funds: "The Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board was created by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 with two goals:
I'm doing this because I like accountability and transparency, and I believe in public service. And it is the complete opposite of
everything else I do. Maybe I'll learn something. The practical consequence is that I will probably go to Washington several days
each month, in addition to whatever homework and phone meetings are necessary. -- Edward Tufte, March 7, 2010 |
|
This gives me the hope that innovation and inspiration is still alive in the new administration. We raise our glass to you and look forward to some feedback for us when possible. -- Kaveh Bazargan (email), March 7, 2010 |
|
Thank you for taking on this role. My first thought is that your skills will be clearly evident in the transparency of the reporting. I think of your excellent work on Challenger and Columbia and anticipate those skills being applied to understanding the distribution of $787 billion of the people's taxes. Congratulations and thank you. -- Kevin Hoffman (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Congratulations! This should be a worthy experience for you. Can you share it with us in a "Tufte goes to Washington" journal? (I suspect this thread will do nicely.) -- Vassilis Golfinopoulos (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Mr. Tufte, I attended to one of your Beautiful Evidence events, and I can't think of anyone more qualified to graphically explain the recovery stimulus fund. Look forward to review your work with Mr. Obama. Regards, Mau. -- Mau Sandoval (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Congratulations! The first thing I thought when I heard the news was that White House press releases are about to get a whole lot more sparklines. :-) -- David Leppik (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Mr. Tufte, So glad to hear that you'll be a part of this. I'm sure you'll be able to help make the data accessible to mere citizens. I'm sure you'll ask the hard questions as well. (I'm thinking of Richard Feynman's valuable service on the panel investigating the Challenger disaster, not that the 2 are the same, but he was someone from outside of government who used his unique perspective to make very important contributions.) Good luck to you and thanks for serving! Matt Taylor -- Matthew Taylor (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Congratulations on your appointment. It is certainly an area in which you should be able to contribute something useful... though, government commissions being what they are, you may be forced to resort to Feynman-esque tactics to do so. Do keep in mind that one of the serious concerns with the existing website is the quality of the underlying data. You have undoubtedly heard the stories of the non-existent Congressional districts being included in the data reporting. A deeper concern, from a data- quality standpoint, has to do with the "job created or saved" data. Most of this data, as I understand it, is self-reported by the recipients of stimulus funding, provided in answer to a form which requires that information to be filled out. There's no independent validation of the self-reported figures, and little guidance given to the funding recipients as to how to answer that question. There's significant concern that most simply tally up the salaries which will be directly paid by the funding and report that, perhaps also adding some multiplier for indirect jobs presumed to be created by every federal dollar spent in a community. There are deep issues of economic assumptions there, of course, but there's also the reality that many of those jobs are not really "saved" by the stimulus funding, because the stimulus funding is merely being used as a substitute for state funding which would have almost certainly been used for the same purpose anyway, but which now can be diverted towards projects not covered by stimulus funding. For these and other reasons, I think a big part of the challenge of this project is to provide information while also clearly conveying the uncertainties and unreliabilities of the underlying data. Best of luck to you with this project! -- Patrick Martin (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Congrats Professor Tufte: Our nation needs more service. Quite nice example of using visualization for recovery data here on Riski: http://freerisk.org/wiki/index.php/Recovery#California_Stimulus_Map kind regards, Cate Long -- Cate Long (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Congratulations. I have been a follower of your work for quite some time, and I firmly believe that government accountability can greatly benefit from clarity in data analysis and visualization. All taxpayers want to know for what purpose their dollars are being used, but no one needs another useless pie chart. Looking forward to your contribution to the panel. Can you share with us anything about your expectations, and what you think may come out of this process (from you specifically, not from the panel in general)? Best regards, -S -- Serge VK (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Congratulations! (I hope.) I can't think of a better contributor to help keep the policymakers' thinking aligned with the idea that not all big numbers are the same big number--almost a trillion is quite a bit bigger than $20 million, for example. -- Richard Careaga (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
This might be the most reassuring thing I've read all year. Best of luck! -- Jess S. (email), March 8, 2010 |
|
Congratulations on your appointment, and thanks for making yourself available in this important capacity. In spite of our human and bureaucratic failings, many of us in government service follow your recommendations — or at least try to follow them — daily to communicate clearly and more effectively. Glad to have you (officially) aboard! -- Cliff Tyllick (email), March 9, 2010 |
|
Congratulations and thank you for your service. I hope they will be able to use your insights to promote clear thinking as well as effective communication. It would be wonderful if you can keep us updated here as to where we might see signs of your influence. -- David H. Brown (email), March 10, 2010 |
|
Congratulations! Everybody with whom I share an office was very excited to learn of your appointment. What a terrific forum for intelligent information presentation! -- Andrea (email), March 10, 2010 |
|
Bravo to Mr. Tufte's appointment in the oversight of business that is critical to all Americans. I took Mr. Tufte's invaluable seminar in Boston, MA and was struck by not only his depth regarding all things statistical, but more important, his profound sense of intellectual honesty. This is a characteristic in short supply in our public life. I hope his example becomes infectious among other appointees . . . Tom Rhea (Berklee College of Music) -- Tom Rhea (email), March 12, 2010 |
|
Remember your own advice: Ask, "What would Feynman do?" Re-read, "What Do You Care What Other People Think?" -- curt (email), March 16, 2010 |
|
My most extreme and grateful congratulations go to Barack Obama. ET, it's his best hire EVER not soon enough. -- Megan Jaegerman (email), March 22, 2010 |
|
In Transparency for the Public Sector, Professor Edward L Glaeser makes a point, not his intended point, extra credit, that a great deal of transparency has nothing to do with how existing data is gathered or presented, but how policy decisions obfuscate the picture by choosing which data exist at all. -- Niels Olson (email), May 25, 2010 |
|
Scott Simon on NPR brought you back into my consciousness this morning and I went to your website. Having read your first two books early on, but having missed an opportunity to attend one of your seminars years ago, I am delighted for the re-connection. And even more delighted at your appointment. Congratulations and thank you for your service. I look forward to intelligible government reports (for a change). Tim Hathaway -- Tim Hathaway (email), June 5, 2010 |
|
Congratulations, best wishes, and many thanks. I think many people attracted to your site would be interested in viewing a presentation by Dr. Donald Berwick, nominated by the President to administer Medicare and Medicaid. In 2008, Dr. Berwick gave the Deming Lecture at the Joint Statistical Meetings. It's available in a few formats here: http://www.amstat.org/meetings/jsm/2008/webcasts/ (a large download, btw). While his slides might be lacking (wink) it's one of the most interesting presentations I've stumbled upon and it raises many interesting points about health care. Regards.
-- Joe McCaughey (email), June 24, 2010 |
|
|